<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Throwing in Endorsements &amp; Testimonials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigsellingwebsitedesign.com/articles/throwing-in-endorsements-testimonials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigsellingwebsitedesign.com/articles/throwing-in-endorsements-testimonials/</link>
	<description>Turning Your Bright Ideas Into Big Selling Websites!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:45:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://bigsellingwebsitedesign.com/articles/throwing-in-endorsements-testimonials/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigsellingwebsitedesign.com/index.php/9/throwing-in-endorsements-testimonials/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more about need for testimonials to be checkable. If you go to the glyphius.com website two of the three testimonials are faulty. One no longer exists the other was obviously not tested for sales message as it does not have one. Although I fully trust James and believe him to be totally honest now these sites obviously are no longer use the software they are promoting. This highlights the need to be constantly checking what we are doing and saying even if we first said it some years ago. I know that product is good because I bought it and still running tests on other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more about need for testimonials to be checkable. If you go to the glyphius.com website two of the three testimonials are faulty. One no longer exists the other was obviously not tested for sales message as it does not have one. Although I fully trust James and believe him to be totally honest now these sites obviously are no longer use the software they are promoting. This highlights the need to be constantly checking what we are doing and saying even if we first said it some years ago. I know that product is good because I bought it and still running tests on other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
